Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums & Wikimedia: Finding the common ground
- iTWire Wikimedia: Conference seeks open cultural content, by James Riley. August 3. And a mention in his article on August 10.
- Computerworld Wikimedia event seeks to open up Australian culture, by Dahna McConnachie. August 5
- ABC Radio National, "Breakfast with Fran Kelly", Interview with Liam Wyatt (audio), August 6
- ABC Local Radio (Canberra), Interview with Brianna Laugher, August 6.
- ABC Local Radio (Brisbane), Interview with Liam Wyatt, August 6.
- National Broadband Network will cause a social tipping point: Kate Lundy in Computerworld and Techworld, by Dahna McConnachie. August 7
- Wikipedia's on the wane: study in Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, Brisbane Times, Stuff.co.nz by Asher Moses. August 7
- Canberra Times - at least 1, probably 2 articles. Please help find these references.
- Mentions in the Wikimedia Foundation blog on July 16 (and also August 5)
- GLAM-WIKI Canberra, day 1 Paul Reynolds, National Library NZ August 6 and day 2 August 7.
- GLAM-WIKI day 1 and GLAM-WIKI snippets from day 2 Brianna Laugher, Wikimedia Australia. August 6 & 7
- Finding Common Ground Senator Kate Lundy (text of her keynote speech). August 7
- Some thoughts - post GLAM-WIKI 2009 Paula Bray, Powerhouse Museum. August 9
- Canberra Times Wikimedia GLAMs up by Colin Steele, August 10.
- Feeling glum after GLAM-WIKI in the Social Media and Cultural Communications blog by Angelina Russo, August 10 and a response by Dutch Wikimedia Gerard Meijssen in his blog.
- GLAM-WIKI Piers Higgs, Gaia Resources, August 10.
- Cultural lessons from the crowd in the cloud by Cath Styles, National Archives, August 10.
All of the information sent to attendees can be found here including accomodation discounts, recommended 'prior reading', introductory videos etc.
Why should you attend?
- Wikimedia projects are the largest, most consulted, most accessible and most easily improved information source available. However, the success of the projects depends on the availability of good primary and secondary sources (including multimedia and expert knowledge) that can be shared freely. Attendees from both the GLAM sector and Wikimedia community will gain a detailed understanding of the best-practices of the other.
- Cultural institutions have a mission to preserve cultural content and the expertise but often lack time, money or staff to do this. Preservation requirements or budgetary limitations also often conflict with the mission of improving public knowledge and access. Both Wikimedia and the institutions have a clear common goal: to make our cultural heritage available. Using our strengths to support the weaknesses of the other side, both Wikimedia projects and cultural institutions could benefit from collaboration. Attendees will learn specific ways that collaboration can take place, understand the existing and potential barriers and how to overcome them.
- This event will call together representatives from Australian and New Zealand cultural institutions to produce a world first - a consensus for how to interact with Wikimedia projects which can form the basis for similar discussions around the world. Furthermore, it would produce a set of mutually-agreed guidelines for what each community needs in order to make any collaboration more positive and productive. Attendees will be able to bring the particular concerns and circumstances of their institution to the attention of the conference.
What will you get out of this?
The tangible outcome of this workshop would be a pair of guidelines - one for the Wikimedia community and one for the cultural institution - each containing specific, practical measures to enable the achievement of better online public access to cultural heritage. Whilst underlining the unique nature of each institution's role these guidelines would demonstrate a shared response to the issues raised at the workshop.
The guidelines page would subsequently be presented to the respective boards of management at each institution, indicating their collaborative creation and commonality. Each institution would then be free to act upon these recommendations as it sees fit (the Wikimedia Australia community would assist if requested).
- Other outcomes would be to
- Appreciate the advantages of allowing content to be used in Wikimedia projects and be able to actively engage/assist.
- Compare the state of Australian cultural heritage on Wikimedia projects relative to other countries and see examples of those cou ntries' efforts to improve it.
- Learn practical ways to [help] improve content in Wikimedia that is consistent with an institution's mission.
The guidelines page would be presented to the Wikimedia community at its annual conference - to be held in Buenos Aires in late August. Attending the meeting in Canberra would be staff representatives of the Wikimedia Foundation (HQ) as well as volunteers from European chapter(s) who would report back and integrate the outcomes into their planning.
- Other outcomes would be to
- Appreciate cultural institutions' concerns regarding Wikimedia projects.
- Compare the various means by which the cultural sector is engaging online, and the place of Wikimedia in this sphere.
- Learn best practice for digital restoration, metadata, citation etc.