Return to article

Meeting talk: 2012 AGM/Candidates/Steven Zhang

(questions)
 
(answering)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
Thanks
Thanks
Gideon [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 20:21, 15 November 2012 (EST)
Gideon [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 20:21, 15 November 2012 (EST)
Hi. To answer your questions:
#I don't think I'd have any issues working with any of the other candidates to achieve the aims and goals of the chapter. Even if members of the committee disagree, I still think that we would be reasonable, work towards compromises and do what's best for the chapter. I would do this no matter who was on the committee, infighting gets us nowhere. So, my answer is no.
#No. I am a rather busy person in general but I don't foresee any potential absences on my part,
[[User:Steven Zhang|Steven Zhang]] 22:45, 15 November 2012 (EST)

Latest revision as of 11:45, 15 November 2012

Questions

Hi Steven, thankyou for posting a statement, I have only a couple of questions

  1. Without naming or identifiing the candidate if one exists do you have concerns about working with any candidates to further the goals of WMAU?
  2. do you have any plans that would make you unavailable for an extended period of time?

Thanks Gideon Gnangarra 20:21, 15 November 2012 (EST)

Hi. To answer your questions:

  1. I don't think I'd have any issues working with any of the other candidates to achieve the aims and goals of the chapter. Even if members of the committee disagree, I still think that we would be reasonable, work towards compromises and do what's best for the chapter. I would do this no matter who was on the committee, infighting gets us nowhere. So, my answer is no.
  2. No. I am a rather busy person in general but I don't foresee any potential absences on my part,

Steven Zhang 22:45, 15 November 2012 (EST)