Proposal talk: Affiliated organisations
(go for it) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm just kicking off the talk page, and adding to my watchlist. I have half an idea to make some fairly major edits, really as part of a process to try and help me gain further understanding about the form and nature of the ideas - obviously it's all just one revert away, and as things come up I'll explain my rationale here :-) cheers, [[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]] 21:10, 16 November 2010 (EST) | I'm just kicking off the talk page, and adding to my watchlist. I have half an idea to make some fairly major edits, really as part of a process to try and help me gain further understanding about the form and nature of the ideas - obviously it's all just one revert away, and as things come up I'll explain my rationale here :-) cheers, [[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]] 21:10, 16 November 2010 (EST) | ||
:Go for it. [[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] 21:37, 16 November 2010 (EST) | :Go for it. [[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] 21:37, 16 November 2010 (EST) | ||
I divided the image value by 5 to bring it into line with the photographic equipment grants. Provocative I know, but that's probably a discussion worth having? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] 20:56, 7 August 2011 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 10:56, 7 August 2011
kick off
I'm just kicking off the talk page, and adding to my watchlist. I have half an idea to make some fairly major edits, really as part of a process to try and help me gain further understanding about the form and nature of the ideas - obviously it's all just one revert away, and as things come up I'll explain my rationale here :-) cheers, Privatemusings 21:10, 16 November 2010 (EST)
- Go for it. John Vandenberg 21:37, 16 November 2010 (EST)
I divided the image value by 5 to bring it into line with the photographic equipment grants. Provocative I know, but that's probably a discussion worth having? --99of9 20:56, 7 August 2011 (EST)