Proposal talk: Affiliated organisations
(→content creation funding: comment) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm just kicking off the talk page, and adding to my watchlist. I have half an idea to make some fairly major edits, really as part of a process to try and help me gain further understanding about the form and nature of the ideas - obviously it's all just one revert away, and as things come up I'll explain my rationale here :-) cheers, [[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]] 21:10, 16 November 2010 (EST) | I'm just kicking off the talk page, and adding to my watchlist. I have half an idea to make some fairly major edits, really as part of a process to try and help me gain further understanding about the form and nature of the ideas - obviously it's all just one revert away, and as things come up I'll explain my rationale here :-) cheers, [[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]] 21:10, 16 November 2010 (EST) | ||
:Go for it. [[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] 21:37, 16 November 2010 (EST) | :Go for it. [[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] 21:37, 16 November 2010 (EST) | ||
== content creation funding == | |||
I divided the image value by 5 to bring it into line with the photographic equipment grants. Provocative I know, but that's probably a discussion worth having? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] 20:56, 7 August 2011 (EST) | I divided the image value by 5 to bring it into line with the photographic equipment grants. Provocative I know, but that's probably a discussion worth having? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] 20:56, 7 August 2011 (EST) | ||
:Your opinion on valued/featured images is welcomed. My thinking was that affiliated organisations can provide consistent levels of content creation year after year, the bar can be set lower to promote this relationship. The goal of this proposal is to recognise that an affiliated organisation is a stronger bond that an unidentified person. [[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] 21:05, 7 August 2011 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 11:05, 7 August 2011
kick off
I'm just kicking off the talk page, and adding to my watchlist. I have half an idea to make some fairly major edits, really as part of a process to try and help me gain further understanding about the form and nature of the ideas - obviously it's all just one revert away, and as things come up I'll explain my rationale here :-) cheers, Privatemusings 21:10, 16 November 2010 (EST)
- Go for it. John Vandenberg 21:37, 16 November 2010 (EST)
content creation funding
I divided the image value by 5 to bring it into line with the photographic equipment grants. Provocative I know, but that's probably a discussion worth having? --99of9 20:56, 7 August 2011 (EST)
- Your opinion on valued/featured images is welcomed. My thinking was that affiliated organisations can provide consistent levels of content creation year after year, the bar can be set lower to promote this relationship. The goal of this proposal is to recognise that an affiliated organisation is a stronger bond that an unidentified person. John Vandenberg 21:05, 7 August 2011 (EST)