Proposal talk: Proposed membership table

Revision as of 02:07, 5 December 2012

main space

I would think the presence of a few members on this page indicates that it's not really a proposed table, it's an actual table. Do you need a formal 2nder to move it to mainspace? - I'm tempted to move it across sometime in the next few days if you don't mind? cheers, Privatemusings 14:10, 4 December 2012 (EST)

Your name is missing from the list :P

Please do not move the page to mainspace. We have a proposals process. We need to build a process around this, and think about the edge cases. The committee then reviews and approves content going into mainspace. If you dont like the process, write a proposal in your userspace to fix the process. :P John Vandenberg 15:43, 4 December 2012 (EST)

I wonder if a page really is equal to a proposal? - I suppose that sorta makes sense - but again, I'd be a fan of us trying to dial down the processes a touch on occasion, with the aim of increasing the likelihood of positive edits / changes etc. - just from the top of my head, I'd say anything which could require funding (and certainly anything which is requesting funding) should follow the proposals process, but I'm not sure something like this should really require it.... otoh, now it's got a 2nder from the committee, I guess I can just move it over? :-) Privatemusings 13:07, 5 December 2012 (EST)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :Your name is missing from the list :P
 :Please do not move the page to mainspace.  We have a [[proposals process]].  We need to build a process around this, and think about the edge cases. The committee then reviews and approves content going into mainspace.  If you dont like the process, write a proposal in your userspace to fix the process. :P [[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] 15:43, 4 December 2012 (EST)
+::I wonder if a page really is equal to a proposal? - I suppose that sorta makes sense - but again, I'd be a fan of us trying to dial down the processes a touch on occasion, with the aim of increasing the likelihood of positive edits / changes etc. - just from the top of my head, I'd say anything which could require funding (and certainly anything which is requesting funding) should follow the proposals process, but I'm not sure something like this should really require it.... otoh, now it's got a 2nder from the committee, I guess I can just move it over? :-) [[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]] 13:07, 5 December 2012 (EST)