Proposal talk: Userspace policy
(re Angela) |
(→Template on all user pages: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
It seems excessive to say that all currently financial members contributing to the page need to agree before a page can be deleted. An admin may need to make the call to delete despite disagreements. [[User:Angela|Angela]] 23:11, 1 December 2012 (EST) | It seems excessive to say that all currently financial members contributing to the page need to agree before a page can be deleted. An admin may need to make the call to delete despite disagreements. [[User:Angela|Angela]] 23:11, 1 December 2012 (EST) | ||
:If we dont require agreement, could we require all users are notified before the deletion happens and are given time to object? [[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] 10:09, 2 December 2012 (EST) | :If we dont require agreement, could we require all users are notified before the deletion happens and are given time to object? [[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] 10:09, 2 December 2012 (EST) | ||
== Template on all user pages == | |||
I believe a template "'''should'''" be on user pages where there might be a problem asserting "ownership", not must. [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] 12:08, 2 December 2012 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 01:08, 2 December 2012
Feedback
I don't know a lot about the policies here, but this does look like an improvement. --Chris Watkins 16:15, 1 December 2012 (EST)
It seems excessive to say that all currently financial members contributing to the page need to agree before a page can be deleted. An admin may need to make the call to delete despite disagreements. Angela 23:11, 1 December 2012 (EST)
- If we dont require agreement, could we require all users are notified before the deletion happens and are given time to object? John Vandenberg 10:09, 2 December 2012 (EST)
Template on all user pages
I believe a template "should" be on user pages where there might be a problem asserting "ownership", not must. Mark Hurd 12:08, 2 December 2012 (EST)