Return to article

Talk: Strategic Plan 2009–2019

(→‎General Feedback: New section.)
m (→‎General Feedback: c/e my own comment)
Line 1: Line 1:
== General Feedback ==
== General Feedback ==
I should say, I don't violently object with anything said and, on first thought, I don't have any particular disagreement with anything here being generally doable -- it just needs people to do it :-) [[User:Markhurd|markhurd]] 17:37, 27 August 2011 (EST)
I don't violently object with anything said and, on first thought, I don't have any particular disagreement with anything here being generally doable -- it just needs people to do it :-) [[User:Markhurd|markhurd]] 17:37, 27 August 2011 (EST)


== Grow: Develop regional Aussie outreach ==
== Grow: Develop regional Aussie outreach ==


There is an incomplete sentence in the middle of [[Draft Strategic Plan#Grow: Develop regional Aussie outreach]]. I have made it more obvious, but it is unlikely the sentence structure will be correct with just adding missing words because it is currently saying "...  can both bring in ..., but also ...". [[User:Markhurd|markhurd]] 17:34, 27 August 2011 (EST)
There is an incomplete sentence in the middle of [[Draft Strategic Plan#Grow: Develop regional Aussie outreach]]. I have made it more obvious, but it is unlikely the sentence structure will be correct with just adding missing words because it is currently saying "...  can both bring in ..., but also ...". [[User:Markhurd|markhurd]] 17:34, 27 August 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 08:25, 27 August 2011

General Feedback

I don't violently object with anything said and, on first thought, I don't have any particular disagreement with anything here being generally doable -- it just needs people to do it :-) markhurd 17:37, 27 August 2011 (EST)

Grow: Develop regional Aussie outreach

There is an incomplete sentence in the middle of Draft Strategic Plan#Grow: Develop regional Aussie outreach. I have made it more obvious, but it is unlikely the sentence structure will be correct with just adding missing words because it is currently saying "... can both bring in ..., but also ...". markhurd 17:34, 27 August 2011 (EST)