Return to article

Talk: Strategic Plan 2009–2019

Revision as of 02:46, 19 September 2011 by Markhurd (talk | contribs) (→‎Program vs Programme: changed back)

General Feedback

I don't violently object with anything said and, on first thought, I don't have any particular disagreement with anything here being generally doable -- it just needs people to do it :-) markhurd 17:37, 27 August 2011 (EST)

Grow: Develop regional Australian outreach

There is an incomplete sentence in the middle of Draft Strategic Plan#Grow: Develop regional Australian outreach. I have made it more obvious, but it is unlikely the sentence structure will be correct with just adding missing words because it is currently saying "... can both bring in ..., but also ...". markhurd 17:34, 27 August 2011 (EST)

Program vs Programme

I'm not going to revert User:Tony1's edits for this, but I'm slightly more of the opinion that Australians (who are not of an IT persuasion) do still use "programme" for non-computer programs. markhurd 12:57, 1 September 2011 (EST)

  • Yes, I made a conscious choice to use "programme" simply to avoid confusion with "computer program". It is also the term we use internally which had a bearing on that. Lankiveil 17:54, 4 September 2011 (EST).
Yes check.svg Done - On that response, I decided it is worth reverting to programme, except for the "Global University Program", which seems to be referred to that on other sites. markhurd 12:46, 19 September 2011 (EST)